In a recent meeting of the Okanogan County Commissioners, Matt Marsh, a representative from the Tonasket Ranger District, revealed a secret that could send shockwaves through the forest management community – or not. The Colville National Forest, in an act of supreme independence, decided to withdraw from the Northeastern Washington Forest Health Collaborative, all because of one Tim Coleman, a member who allegedly betrayed their trust.

The story goes that the Forest Service, in a stunning display of transparency, shared vital information with the collaborative members, only to be sued by Coleman in the eleventh hour. Oh, the humanity! It appears that the age-old adage holds: no good deed goes unpunished.

Now, let’s consider the pros and cons of this dramatic exit from the collaborative. On one hand, the Forest Service can now make decisions without fear of litigation from pesky collaborative members who just can’t seem to play nice. On the other hand, by withdrawing, the Forest Service may lose out on the valuable input and expertise of other members. Quite the conundrum!

But wait, there’s more! By removing themselves from the collaborative, is the Forest Service, under the watchful eye of Matt Marsh, attempting to establish their own fiefdom, free from the pesky public’s opinions? Are they trying to sidestep environmental regulations and the priorities of state and federal governments? The plot thickens!

The importance of public input in managing our forests cannot be overstated. After all, these are public lands, and the public should have a say in how they are managed. By withdrawing from the collaborative, the Forest Service may be robbing the public of their voice, leaving them in the dark about the fate of their beloved forests.

Despite this tangled web of hurt feelings, the Tonasket Ranger District continues to forge ahead with its 20-year plan, prioritizing fire-sheds like there’s no tomorrow. One can only hope that their brave decision to withdraw from the collaborative will lead to a brighter, less flammable future for Okanogan County’s forests, and not a secretive, regulation-skirting fiefdom.

In conclusion, the Tonasket Ranger District’s withdrawal from the Forest Health Collaborative is a tale of intrigue, betrayal, and hope. As we watch this saga unfold, let’s remember that sometimes, the path to true forest management is paved with broken trust, sarcastic satire, and the potential loss of public input.

Alas, it seems that the Tonasket Ranger District, by withdrawing from the collaborative, may have inadvertently (or not) thrown a wrench into the very gears of the 2012 Planning Rule. Let us examine the potential consequences of this daring escape:

Public Involvement and Collaboration: By bidding adieu to the Forest Health Collaborative, the Tonasket Ranger District may have limited public involvement in forest management decisions. Is the Forest Service conspiring to keep their actions shrouded in mystery? Do they fear the mighty voice of the public?

Coordination and Cooperation Beyond National Forest System Boundaries: The Forest Service’s departure from the collaborative could signal a retreat from cross-boundary cooperation, leaving them to face the challenges of fire, water, and wildlife management alone. Will they become a lone wolf in the wilderness of forest management?

As we eagerly await further developments in this satirical saga, let us hope that our intrepid Forest Service will find a way to honor the spirit of public involvement, collaboration, and cross-boundary cooperation for the sake of our cherished national forests.

#ForestManagement #TonasketRangerDistrict #PublicInvolvement #Collaboration #OkanoganCounty #ColvilleNationalForest #NFMA #2012PlanningRule #ForestHealthCollaborative #EnvironmentalRegulations